Complexity is not a paradigm shift

Claims are made such as ‘complexity entails a scientific revolution, hence a radical shift in science’.

It’s a Rorschach blot
  1. seeing the organisational potential within the system
    (from whatever source or level — systems/complexity/cybernetics can equally identify/support/set up structured, command-and-control hierarchies (say, Jacques’ Stratified Systems Theory), and the conditions for ‘pure self-organisation’)
  2. seeing the role of the observer, a second order perspective
    that the observer creates the ‘system’ (or the complexity or chaos); that talking about these terms — or pattern and nebulosity in general — outside of a loop between the observer and what is being observed — is meaningless
  3. making critical boundary judgements, i.e. understanding that the framing we bring to our observations has implications (this follows from (2))




business evolutionary all pieces duplicated at

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Sunscreen for the mind

The Infinite Epistemology

Understanding M: My Notes from Marx — Wages of Labor

Caught Between Destiny and Discretion

Intellectuals and Logicians

The Forbidden Question



Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Benjamin P. Taylor

Benjamin P. Taylor

business evolutionary all pieces duplicated at

More from Medium

Shifting Volunteer Systems Futures with Co-Design in Wales

Eight Questions With Featured Grey Swan Guild Member: Akash Das

Welcome to Terranascient Futures Studies & Foresight